Fintech Toolkit · Examination Readiness Dashboard
Examination Readiness Toolkit
Most examinations are not lost on the substance of the programme. They are lost in the gap between what the programme actually does and what the examiner can verify in the documents you produce. This dashboard runs that production process — scoping, request-letter response, document control, interview prep, finding lifecycle — so the gap is closed before the examiner is in the room.
Thirteen modules. Single HTML file. Runs offline. Owned forever.
$497 USD · paid once · single-organisation licence
Built on the frameworks your examiner uses — FFIEC BSA / AML Examination Manual, FFIEC IT Handbook, OCC Comptroller's Handbook, FDIC RMS Manual, Federal Reserve SR letters, CFPB Supervision and Examination Manual, NYDFS examination procedures.
Just ran the self-check?
If you scored Some gaps or At risk on the free Exam-Readiness Self-Check, this is the kit that closes each one. The eight axes you were scored on map directly to the thirteen modules below — scoping, request-letter response, document production, interview prep, finding lifecycle, board reporting, remediation and multi-cycle history. Run the self-check first if you have not; then come back here and close the gaps it found.
What's inside
01
Programme Framework
Cycle map · pre / on-site / post · roles · governance
02
Pre-Exam Scoping
Notification · scope memo · point-of-contact · privilege posture
03
Readiness Score
Live JS · 8-axis · band → action · cycle-over-cycle delta
04
Request-Letter Response
Tracker · owner · due date · privilege flag · production log
05
Document Production
Bates-style numbering · production index · quality check · re-production
06
Interview Prep
Witness map · briefing memo · mock interview · privilege guardrails
07
On-Site Walk-Through
Logistics · presentation deck · live demo · Q&A protocol
08
Finding Lifecycle
Verbal → draft → formal · response window · root cause · remediation
09
MRA / MRIA Tracking
Severity · owner · milestone · evidence · closure standard
10
Board Reporting
Pre-exam brief · live escalation · post-exam findings memo
11
Post-Exam Remediation
Plan · validation · independent verification · sustainable closure
12
Multi-Cycle History
Repeat-finding test · trend analysis · examiner-to-examiner continuity
13
Committee Charter
CCO chair · counsel advisor · cross-functional · privileged where appropriate
Built for
- Chief Compliance Officers / BSA Officers preparing for safety-and-soundness, BSA / AML, consumer-compliance, IT, or sponsor-bank examinations
- Heads of Risk / Audit owning the cross-functional exam workstream
- General Counsel running privilege and production posture
- CFOs / COOs at fintechs facing their first regulatory examination
- External counsel and independent examination consultants
What it's worth
An examination consultant runs $300–500 an hour. A single Matter Requiring Attention can put a fintech's sponsor-bank relationship at risk and consume months of remediation. This is one file, $497, owned forever — less than an hour of outside help, and it stays with you across every examination cycle, not just this one.
We make no claim about your examination outcome — that rests on your programme and your judgement. What this gives you is the structure to produce a defensible, examiner-ready record instead of assembling it under a deadline.
Format + licence
- Single HTML file. Runs offline. Editable. Print-friendly.
- 1 working JS calculator (examination readiness · 8-axis weighted).
- Single-organisation licence. Methodology output (your readiness score, your request-letter tracker, your finding register) is yours to keep.
What operators say
[Awaiting a real, permission-granted practitioner quote.]
Owned forever · paid once
14-day guarantee. Full refund, no questions asked. If it doesn't earn its place in your exam prep, email us and it's reversed. The risk sits with us, not you.
$497 USD
Buy now · $497Stripe checkout. Single HTML file emailed within 1 business hour.
"The exam is rarely lost on the substance of the programme. It is most often lost on the gap between what the programme actually does and what the examiner can verify in the documents produced. Run the production process like an audit on yourself."
